The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) told Congress that it would no longer deliver in-person election security briefings, a move that’s angered lawmakers as Election Day approaches.
The change could make it more difficult for members of Congress to ask detailed questions about election security or press officials on their findings, a worrisome proposition for oversight in a year when foreign meddling has already been confirmed.
Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe, a Trump loyalist confirmed to the position in May, informed members of the House and Senate Friday of the change, noting they will continue to provide members with written updates. Ratcliffe explained to congressional leaders that the move is to prevent “unauthorized disclosures,” a.k.a. leaks, of sensitive information by members of Congress, which he suggested was taking place. (He didn’t explain why verbal briefings would be subject to leaks but written briefings would not.)
“I believe this approach helps ensure, to the maximum extent possible, that the information ODNI provides Congress in support of your oversight responsibilities on elections security, foreign malign influence, and election interference is not misunderstood nor politicized,” Ratcliffe wrote in a letter dated August 28. “It will also better protect our sources and methods and most sensitive intelligence from additional unauthorized disclosures or misuse.”
CNN, citing an ODNI official, reported that other intelligence entities that play a role in election security, including the FBI and Department of Homeland Security, will continue to brief lawmakers.
But lawmakers directly pushed back against Ratcliffe’s decision, with most of the criticism came from Democrats who called the decision “outrageous.”
“The Office of the Director of National Intelligence has an obligation to brief Congress on threats to our elections. Director Ratcliffe’s outrageous decision to stop providing briefings to Congress is an unprecedented attempt to politicize an issue — protecting our democracy from foreign intervention — that should be non-partisan,” Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA), vice chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said in a statement.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), chair of the House Intelligence Committee, said in a joint statement that the DNI’s decision is “a shocking abdication of its lawful responsibility to keep the Congress currently informed, and a betrayal of the public’s right to know how foreign powers are trying to subvert our democracy.” They added that the ODNI had canceled an election briefing for lawmakers scheduled in mid-September.
As for Republicans, Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) said the change was being “blown out of proportion.” Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL), the acting chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee also accused member of Congress of leaking and politicizing information, but said in a statement that that “does not release the intelligence community from fulfilling its legal requirements to respond to Congressional oversight committees and to keep members of Congress fully informed of relevant information on a timely basis.”
This change — with just two months until election day — comes after the National Counterintelligence and Security Center Director William Evanina confirmed in August that foreign actors were attempting to influence the 2020 election, calling out Russia, China, and Iran. The ODNI acknowledged that “Russia is using a range of measures to primarily denigrate former Vice President Biden,” but said China and Iran preferred Biden. Some Democrats had urged intelligence officials to release more information publicly so American voters could be on guard against election interference.
Why limiting briefings before November 3 is a big deal
The ODNI’s decision to switch to mostly written briefings likely means intelligence officials will get to more tightly control what information is included in those reports. It’s not clear how thorough those briefings will be, and that may limit what details Congress and the public know about election security weeks before the election. Rep. Schiff has suggested that Congress could subpoena the information, if necessary.
Evelyn Farkas, a former senior Pentagon official for Russia, Ukraine, and Eurasia from 2012 to 2015, said that foreign and domestic threats against free and fair elections are political warfare. “When there’s any kind of war, you get regular in-person briefings from the administration,” she told me. “Why? Because it’s urgent, you need to be kept up to date as a member of Congress, because you need to be able to make decisions about funding, about whether the administration is doing a good enough job as part of their oversight responsibilities.”
She added it also directly involves members of Congress — many are running for reelection, after all — and the constituents who could potentially be influenced. Sources and methods need to be protected, but the more the public is aware of the real threats, the better a safeguard for our elections.
And the ODNI’s decision to scale back briefings comes amid larger questions about the potential politicization of intelligence under the Trump administration.
President Donald Trump has repeatedly rejected the intelligence community’s assessment that Russia interfered in the 2016 election with the goal of boosting his candidacy, and he has downplayed the Kremlin’s 2020 activities, contradicting his own officials. A New York Times investigation revealed that intelligence officials tweaked assessments about Russia’s aims in the 2020 election so as not to upset the president.
Trump first tried to nominate Ratcliffe for the intelligence job in July 2019, but Ratcliffe was quickly forced to withdraw his nomination after bipartisan pushback over his qualifications and because he embellished his resume.
Joseph Maguire took over as the acting DNI, but Trump fired him in February, reportedly because he was furious over a briefing to Congress that indicated Russia again preferred Trump. In his place, Trump appointed Ric Grenell, the then-US ambassador to Germany and another Trump loyalist with no intelligence experience, to serve as the new acting director. Then, Trump nominated Ratcliffe again — and won.
Trump and his Republican allies have used the conclusions of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation — which did not find conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russian actors but confirmed Russian interference in the 2016 elections — to accuse Democrats of overhyping the “Russia hoax.” But a bipartisan Senate investigation also found that Russia did meddle to help Trump in 2016, and their final report details that Russia most definitely made overtures to the Trump campaign and found among their ranks people who were receptive to foreign help.
By all accounts, Russia is at it again — and China and Iran, too, are contemplating strategies to undermine the 2020 election. That’s a national security threat to all Americans, but the public’s understanding of it is increasingly being shaped by partisan divisions. Foreign actors, like Russia, have tried to exploit these very divisions. And that ultimately makes it much easier for those interference activities to succeed in undermining American democracy.
Help keep Vox free for all
Millions turn to Vox each month to understand what’s happening in the news, from the coronavirus crisis to a racial reckoning to what is, quite possibly, the most consequential presidential election of our lifetimes. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. But our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources — particularly during a pandemic and an economic downturn. Even when the economy and the news advertising market recovers, your support will be a critical part of sustaining our resource-intensive work, and helping everyone make sense of an increasingly chaotic world. Contribute today from as little as $3.